Clinical Trials Day: Thanking the Unsung Heroes
On Clinical Trials Day, now more than ever, it’s important to recognize and thank those unsung heroes at the focal point of research: research sites and institutions.
On Clinical Trials Day, now more than ever, it’s important to recognize and thank those unsung heroes at the focal point of research: research sites and institutions.
As clinical trials increase in complexity, you gain more value from using each resource at your disposal wisely. Many organizations
Now more than ever, people are seeking out employment at organizations that offer more than just standard benefits. They are
In a recent webinar, Dr. Luke Gelinas, IRB Chair at Advarra, provided a framework for evaluating offers of payment to research participants. In addition to outlining the challenging ethical and regulatory issues and offering key regulatory guidance, he also provided hypothetical “case studies” to highlight challenging ethical and regulatory aspects of paying research participants. More than 1,000 clinical research professionals joined us for the webinar, which was followed by an engaging Q&A session. Below, Dr. Gelinas answers audience questions we weren’t able to address during the webinar. In the weeks ahead, we will publish part two of his responses, addressing additional questions from webinar attendees.
Scientific abstracts and articles have reported that 20-50% of studies do not accrue subjects at the site level (1-6). This contributes to a significant amount of waste in clinical research, particularly in the forms of staff time and monetary resources. Such waste can be reduced through the careful selection of clinical trials to activate early in the process, before investing a lot of resources. The protocol feasibility review process achieves this by providing a method to review the logistical aspects of a clinical trial prior to starting the activation process.
Study activation data from the Forte community shows on average, it takes about six months to activate a new, interventional, treatment clinical trial. Long activation periods are not a new trend – in 2008, Dr. David Dilts’ findings showed it took hundreds of steps to activate an NCI-funded trial at a single site. This was just to get the study open to accrual, not to conduct the study. He also found that not all steps added value to the process. To make his point, he charted the study activation process and when he was done, it was 50 feet long by 5 feet tall and in 8-point font! If the clinical development time of a new treatment is to ever decrease, reducing the time in study activation is necessary so actual research can be done.
Research doesn’t just inform medical treatment; it informs public health and public policy, and it helps explain human behaviors.
Independent verification of compliance opens new doors for CRIO, Inc. and provides customers confidence that they can incorporate the eSource system into their own computer software validation strategy.
Discover how Advarra Insights helped UW Carbone Cancer Center reduce manual reporting and gain actionable visibility into accrual metrics and operations.
As we near the end of 2019, let’s take a look back at the blogs that generated the most interest this year from readers like you.
Learn how UW Carbone Cancer Center leveraged Advarra EVAL to improve CCSG processes, saving resources while earning an “Outstanding” renewal grade.
Learn how IU’s Simon Cancer Center cut staff time by 52%, reduced inefficiencies, and optimized workflows with Advarra Participant Payments.